Field (mathematical concept): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "A '''field''' is a set closed under two binary operations, with some special properties by definition. == Formal definition == Let $F:|F| \ge 2$ be a set, and $+,\cdot$ two binary operations defined over $F$. If $\forall a,b,c \in F$: * $a+b=b+a;a \cdot b = b \cdot a$ ('''commutativity''') * $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c);(a \cdot b)\cdot c = a \cdot (b \cdot c)$ ('''associativity''') * $\exists 0_F,1_F \in F: a+0_F=a, a \cdot 1_F=a$ ('''identity''') * $\e..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<ref>{{#cite:Q2202}}</ref> | <blockquote> | ||
Alternatively, a field can be defined as a [[ring]] with additional properties: | |||
* $a \cdot b = b \cdot a$ ('''multiplicative commutativity''') | |||
* $\exists 1_F \in F: a \cdot 1_F=a$ ('''multiplicative identity''') | |||
* $\forall a \neq 0_F: \exists (a^{-1}) \in F, a\cdot (a^{-1})=1_F$ ('''multiplicative inverse''') | |||
Also, note unlike for rings, there is no need to specify distributivity for each slot, since the slots for multiplication are symmetric in a field because of multiplicative commutativity. | |||
<ref>{{#cite:Q2202}}</ref><ref>{{#cite:Q2204}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
Revision as of 14:03, 16 October 2026
A field is a set closed under two binary operations, with some special properties by definition.
Formal definition
Let $F:|F| \ge 2$ be a set, and $+,\cdot$ two binary operations defined over $F$.
If $\forall a,b,c \in F$:
- $a+b=b+a;a \cdot b = b \cdot a$ (commutativity)
- $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c);(a \cdot b)\cdot c = a \cdot (b \cdot c)$ (associativity)
- $\exists 0_F,1_F \in F: a+0_F=a, a \cdot 1_F=a$ (identity)
- $\exists (-a) \in F: a + (-a)=0_F; \forall a \neq 0_F: \exists (a^{-1}) \in F, a\cdot (a^{-1})=1_F$ (inverse)
- $a\cdot (b+c)=a\cdot b + a\cdot c$ (distributivity)
Then $(F,+,\cdot)$ is a field.
Example:
| $F$ | $(F,+,\cdot )$ is field? |
|---|---|
| $\mathbb{N}$ | No, $a=1 \in \mathbb{N}: \nexists (-1) \in \mathbb{N}$ |
| $\mathbb{Z}$ | No, $a=2 \in \mathbb{N}: \nexists (2^{-1}) \in \mathbb{Z}$ |
| $\mathbb{Q}$ | Yes |
| $\mathbb{R}$ | Yes |
Alternatively, a field can be defined as a ring with additional properties:
- $a \cdot b = b \cdot a$ (multiplicative commutativity)
- $\exists 1_F \in F: a \cdot 1_F=a$ (multiplicative identity)
- $\forall a \neq 0_F: \exists (a^{-1}) \in F, a\cdot (a^{-1})=1_F$ (multiplicative inverse)
Also, note unlike for rings, there is no need to specify distributivity for each slot, since the slots for multiplication are symmetric in a field because of multiplicative commutativity.
- ↑ Michael Janssen and Melissa Lindsey. (2026). 2.1: Fields. LibreTexts. https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Abstract_and_Geometric_Algebra/Rings_with_Inquiry_(Janssen_and_Lindsey)/02%3A_Fields_and_Rings/2.01%3A_Fields
- ↑ Michael Janssen and Melissa Lindsey. (2026). 2.2: Rings. LibreTexts. https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Abstract_and_Geometric_Algebra/Rings_with_Inquiry_(Janssen_and_Lindsey)/02%3A_Fields_and_Rings/2.02%3A_Rings